There’s a saying that old machines never die, they just get moved to another factory. Okay, maybe there isn’t a saying, but there should be. It’s a testament to the talents of OEM machine builders that for applications ranging from ketchup packaging to lumber processing, machines can last 20, 30, even 50 years. That’s some tough steel and some good design. It does raise a problem that doesn’t perhaps get talked about as much as it should, though—obsolescence mitigation.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m a hardware geek from way back. As a technology writer, I’m trained to perpetually look for the latest and greatest. That’s where the excitement is—unless you’re an OEM with dozens of machines in the field under warranty, based on components from the previous generation. That’s when things start to get complicated, especially as the years go by. Remember, we’re talking about machines that operate for decades. Sure, vendors support a product line after it’s been discontinued, but as the parts begin to near end-of-life (EOL), that support begins to wane. Suddenly, the leadtime stretches out from a couple of weeks to multiple months. For an OEM supporting customers for whom an hour of downtime can cost thousands of dollars, that kind of delay is simply not feasible. Sure, an easy solution would be to upgrade to the next-generation, but they may not want to. More to the point, their customer may not want to.

EOL affects everyone in the food chain. After all, it’s not as though motion vendors are immune from the challenge. Try being a controller or drives vendor and having a critical COTS chip go EOL (give me a moment and I’ll figure out a way to stick yet another acronym in that sentence, just see if I don’t).

It’s an unavoidable problem, but one for which the industry can take a cue from the military and aerospace sector. There, obsolescence mitigation has become a big deal, as the industry increasingly incorporates commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) products. COTS components provide low-cost, high-availability solutions—but only for a limited time, not nearly long enough to meet military timelines. After all, when it comes to COTS components, the 10-ton gorilla known as the consumer electronics industry drives product lifecycles. Vendors can’t afford to support a product for 30 years to satisfy a minor market when their primary customer needs a new chip every six months. Gradually, though, the market has begun to figure it out. Some IC manufacturers who are preparing to stop production of a chip will call their customers and offer to pattern a certain number of wafers and store them in a controlled environment, undiced and unpackaged, waiting until the customer needs them. Meanwhile, an entire cottage industry has sprung up around manufacturers who will fabricate COTS products that have been discontinued by other vendors.

In the motion control industry, vendors do provide EOL notices and extend opportunities for last-time buys. It’s a delicate balancing act, however. Order too much, and you’re tying up capital and warehouse space unnecessarily. Order too little and you may find yourself scouring spec sheets trying to find a replacement product so you can make good on your customer support.

The point is that even while the motion industry focuses on pushing the technology forward, vendors need to remember to also have an obsolescence mitigation policy for their customers. Just as important, OEMs need to understand the EOL policies of their vendors—assuming they exist.

Does your company have an obsolescence mitigation policy in place? Do your vendors? Some potential questions for your key suppliers include:

  • What previous product lines have they obsoleted?
  • What is their EOL policy?
  • What is the typical life cycle for new products?
  • At what stage is the product that you’re considering for my new design?
  • Is there a replacement product under development that still may meet your design schedule?

Plan for the long term. Make sure that the product you designed today can be supported tomorrow…and for a lot of tomorrows to come.

{ 0 comments }

Skynet Meets Machine Builders

by Bill Allai on December 20, 2011

Let’s fast-forward to the year 2020. Machines have likely not yet become self-aware, but I can imagine a world where machines diagnose and even cure their own ills. There are a multitude of machine characteristics that we would love to be able to monitor, detect, and fix. Are the gears slipping? Are the bearings beginning to fail? Are component temperatures rising? All these questions lead to the overarching concern of whether the manufacturing process of the end product is deteriorating.

Predictive or preventative maintenance–the techniques, tools, and technology for analyzing machine conditions and identifying machine faults–is well documented. The vast majority of research and investment in this domain has focused on induction motors. Why? The answer is part business and part technical.

From the business angle, large induction machines constitute the majority of fan and pump applications. These large motors represent a huge capital investment. Moreover, the overall impact on a plant can be catastrophic if one of these workhorse motors should fail.

To better understand the technical slant let’s walk through the basics of predictive maintenance operations.  Predictive systems typically digitize the signature of a system by measuring one or more parameters such as current, voltage, vibration, speed, torque, or temperature. Armed with that information, the results are analyzed in both the time and frequency domains.  It is important to note that much of the analytics for applying predictive maintenance techniques are valid only under constant velocity conditions.  For example, by examining the harmonic content in the frequency domain specific failures such as a broken rotor bar or damaged stator can be identified. Given that induction motors are almost exclusively operated in constant velocity applications these techniques can be applied.

Of course, a typical servo system is highly dynamic, so these analysis methods are no longer valid.  How, then, can we develop predictive maintenance techniques for these systems? One approach is to take a snapshot of the machine “at birth”–that is, when it is presumably operating at its most efficient state. This is sometimes referred to as the zero-hour baseline. From then on, simple analysis can be applied by setting thresholds based on historical information for the machine that can provide general results about the machine’s health and process performance. Although this may not always provide information specific enough to pinpoint the failing component, it at least provides early warning that something is wrong.

Looking into the near future, there are already some interesting developments bringing us closer to realizing our utopian vision for 2020. Highly intelligent drives can measure and retain process information for the zero-hour baseline. Over time, such a drive can compensate for changes in performance by adjusting tuning coefficients, filters, and other control parameters transparently until it observes that the measured parameters are in accordance with the initial process data. Another opportunity for improved predictive techniques lies in integrated solutions. Tying together the actuation, drive, motor, and control into a single unit provides direct access to the physical load and subcomponents allowing higher fidelity information about the machine state.

I look forward to much innovation in the years ahead, and for the self-diagnosing machine to move from the pages of comic books to the factory floor.

{ 0 comments }

Lean Manufacturing, Value, and the Wave Function Of Future Business

September 23, 2011
Thumbnail image for Lean Manufacturing, Value, and the Wave Function Of Future Business

When it comes to the benefits of motion control, most of us can recite them in our sleep: faster changeover, easier maintenance, reduced downtime, smaller footprint, increased accuracy, cleaner operation. Motion control in the manufacturing environment: enables lean manufacturing that results in less capital tied up in inventory, less tied up in materials, less money [...]

Read the full article →

PID Tuning – 21st Century Style

August 31, 2011
Thumbnail image for PID Tuning – 21st Century Style

Slide the bar to the right, slide the bar to the left, less integral, more differential – are we having fun yet? Tuning PID loops is not something I personally consider a fun part of the automation experience.  Sure, there are some scientific methods we’ve likely all been exposed to—such as Ziegler-Nichols and Cohen-Coon, but [...]

Read the full article →

The Tower of Babel

August 10, 2011

EthernetIP…ProfiNet…EtherCat…CANOpen… DeviceNet…ModBus…You can’t produce motion without communications. Whether you’re talking bus protocols or Ethernet, you’ve got a bevy options—and that’s just the problem. When I first began covering this space five years ago, I assumed that over time the field would narrow to a single, dominant, open protocol. So far, that doesn’t appear to be [...]

Read the full article →

The Next Step in Step Motor Control

July 25, 2011

In our latest blog installment I will introduce a popular trend for improved step motor control. I’ve not yet seen an industry wide accepted term for this type of solution. For the sake of having something to refer to, we’ll call these solutions ‘stepper torque control’. Although this technology is catching on it has yet [...]

Read the full article →

AMP Gives Manufacturing a Charge

June 28, 2011

US President Obama meets with PCAST members Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/pcast By now, you’ve probably heard about the Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (AMP), a program designed to catapult manufacturing forward and jumpstart the U.S. economy. Not that the private sector hasn’t been working on that whole catapulting thing already, but AMP provides a framework for coordinating efforts between [...]

Read the full article →

Integrated Motors and You

June 10, 2011

Rise of the Integrated Motion Solution? By Bill Allai, Motion Control Principal Engineer, National Instruments; Chairman, Motion Control Association Over the last several years, especially the most recent 12 months, I’ve seen a wave of new product development in the realm of integrated motion control solutions.  The packaging sector is responsible for much of this [...]

Read the full article →

How do they move all that stuff around?

May 26, 2011

We live in a world of big box stores. If you are lucky to live in a wonderful college town like I do, they are not in your city, but they are all around you. Have you ever wondered about all the stuff that stores like that sell? The sheer volume is daunting. Are Amazon [...]

Read the full article →